The client had been running energy trading operations on an Oracle-based monolithic platform for over a decade. It had served them well — but the business had grown faster than the architecture could handle. Position data arrived a day late. Infrastructure costs were climbing. And any change to one part of the system risked breaking another.
The immediate trigger was a Trayport API migration — a hard deadline that forced the question: patch the existing system, or rebuild properly? They chose to rebuild.
<aside> 💡
T+1 position updates Trading decisions being made on yesterday's data — a significant risk exposure in volatile markets.
</aside>
<aside> 💡
Monolithic architecture Every change required full regression testing. Deployment cycles were slow and risky.
</aside>
<aside> 💡
Rising infrastructure cost Oracle licensing and on-premise hardware costs scaling with data volumes, not with value.
</aside>
<aside> 💡
Trayport API deadline A hard migration deadline from a key market data provider — with no flexibility on timing.
</aside>
We started by mapping every data flow in the existing system before touching a single line of code. That mapping — understanding exactly what moved where, and what depended on what — is what made a zero-downtime migration possible.
The migration delivered what the client needed — but more importantly, it delivered a platform that does not constrain what comes next.
<aside> 💡
Sub-second position tracking Position data now updates in sub-second intervals — down from T+1 batch. Trading decisions are made on current data.
</aside>
<aside> 💡
Zero downtime migration The full migration was executed without interrupting live trading operations — no maintenance windows, no data loss.
</aside>